I'M NOT RAPPAPORT | ||||||||||
|
12/8/96
Herb Gardner's plays hold a special place in my heart. The first monologue I memorized for acting class was from "A Thousand Clowns." I did a miserable job and I only realized how wretched I was when I saw its film adaptation.
Another Gardner play has now made it to the screen,
one that holds a place in the hearts of many people and many critics.
"I'm Not Rappaport" won the 1986 Tony Award for Best
Play, the Outer Critics Circle Award for Outstanding Play and
the John Gassner Playwriting Award. Gardner wrote the screenplay,
directed the film and got Ossie Davis to reprise his Broadway
performance as Midge. So this film, I'M NOT RAPPAPORT, has the
strength of being the most authentic adaptation imaginable. Unfortunately,
that's one of its greatest weaknesses.
The story follows the peregrinations of Nat, played
by Walter Matthau and his reluctant buddy Midge (played by Ossie
Davis). Actually, we never learn Nat's name until near the very
end of the movie; Nat keeps his identity hidden in a three ring
circus of lies. He argues that since he was one person for the
last 50 years, he's going to be 50 people for the last five. Those
50 include an undercover agent, an attorney, a consumer protection
watchdog, even a mob boss. Midge shares a bench with Nat in New
York's Central Park. He can't stand being taken in by Nat's tall
tales, but he can't stop himself from listening either. Both men
are in their 80s, trying with all their might to keep a place
in the world -- Midge by clinging to his job as a building super;
Nat by tilting at the windmills of injustice with a Marxist lance.
Walter Matthau and Ossie Davis are perfect in their
roles and they are perfectly paired. Matthau was so convincing
that I was actually duped by some of Nat's lies. His timing and
delivery lifted the laughter from me as a thief lifts the wallet
from an open handbag. Davis operates mainly as Matthau's straight
man, but he's funny, too. Both are moving in their pride, their
dignity, their frailty. You worry for them; you hope they have
the strength to win the battles they face; you pray to have that
much spunk when you reach that age.
The performances would be nothing without a good
script and Herb Gardner definitely wrote some fine roles and great
dialogue. And it really tackles issues of aging and identity better
than, say GRUMPIER OLD MEN. I can see why the play was such a
hit. But it seemed like Gardner couldn't bear to cut very much
when making his adaptation. I'M NOT RAPPAPORT ends up with a run
time of about 2 1/4 hours. I didn't mind that the movie, like
the old men it depicts, takes its time getting places. I just
found myself expecting it to be over about twenty minutes before
it did.
I'm a purist when it comes to art forms. I believe
when you use a form, you should exploit the unique qualities of
that form. Therefore, photography should not be like painting
and film should *definitely* not be like theater. Herb Gardner's
background is in the theater and he directed I'M NOT RAPPAPORT
like a play. I can't put my finger on exactly what makes this
so. The small number of characters and locations contributes.
But it's also the way of setting scenes and decorating sets; of
conveying meaning through words and images. There's a degree of
intensity and a level of literariness that indicates without a
doubt that this movie was originally a play. And my feeling is,
if you don't go beyond placing your scenes on locations instead
of sets, your movie is lacking. You may have a good adaptation
-- which I'M NOT RAPPAPORT certainly is -- but you don't have
a great movie.
The script has been updated since 1986. Nat's socialist
convictions are often parried with the example of the Soviet disintegration.
Yet I'M NOT RAPPAPORT still has an 1980s feel to it. Jogging yuppies
are vilified; humanist, pro-labor values are lionized. I'm not
saying this is wrong, but the treatment seems a little quaint
after the recession and rampant downsizing of the early 90s. I hate to end on such a down note, because I *did* enjoy I'M NOT RAPPAPORT. It's charming, it's funny, the performances are sharp and the issues deep. But it's a play. You get play length and play direction. If you want to see a good play, then go to your movie theater and see I'M NOT RAPPAPORT. |
|||||||||
previous | subscribe | movies | next
Mike's Midnight Movie Reviews |